Reward-Allocation Judgments in Romania: A Factorial Survey Approach.

Autori

  • Carmen Buzea
  • Luiza Mesesan-Schmitz
  • Fons van de J.r. Vijver

Cuvinte cheie:

reward allocation, normative judgments, factorial survey, Romania, norms

Rezumat

We investigated reward-allocation judgments when positive outcomes (monetary rewards) were distributed and the allocator was not a co-recipient, in a sample of 200 Romanian students. Within a full factorial survey design, seven factors, selected to affect the allocation decision, were orthogonally varied. The factors reflect individual characteristics of the recipients (gender, age, contribution, need, work experience) and situational characteristics (future work interaction and task routineness). Romanian students preferred to allocate rewards applying an equitybased distribution model. Work experience and task routineness were also significant, yet less important. The recipient gender has no effect on allocation judgments. In terms of between-respondents variability, we found that students? gender, work experience, and age do not have an impact on reward-allocation judgments. We discuss implications of our findings for organizations and practitioners.

Descărcări

Publicat

2013-03-31

Cum cităm

Buzea, C., Mesesan-Schmitz, L., & J.r. Vijver, F. van de. (2013). Reward-Allocation Judgments in Romania: A Factorial Survey Approach. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 40, 107-123. https://www.rcis.ro/journal/article/view/804-reward-allocation-judgments-in-romania-a-factorial-survey