RCIS

Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Going counter to the facts in program evaluation. Towards a counterfactual evaluation model (CEM)

Going counter to the facts in program evaluation. Towards a counterfactual evaluation model (CEM)

Autor:

Raluca ANTONIE


Cod: ISSN: 1583-3410 (print), ISSN: 1584-5397 (electronic)
Dimensiuni: pp. 224-233


How to cite this article:

Antonie, R. (2012). Going counter to the facts in program evaluation. Towards a counterfactual evaluation model (CEM). Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 36, 224-233.

Abstract:

The present article aims at bringing closer to the public the logic behind Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (CIE). It starts with a semantic disclosure, continuing with asserting the the main counterfactual theories and their application in the Program Evaluation field and ends with the construction of a Counterfactual Evaluation Model. The article intends to present, in an introductory manner, some of the possible and probable uses of the CEM. The main question is: does it make any sense to go counter to the facts in Program Evaluation?

Keywords:

counterfactual; evaluation model; impact; effects; casual theories


Download: Going counter to the facts in program evaluation. Towards a counterfactual evaluation model (CEM)