Abstract
Abstractul prezinta pe scurt scopul, domeniul de aplicare, metodele, rezultatele şi concluziile. Utilizarea limbajului non-tehnic este recomandat pentru abstract, deoarece mulţi oameni nu sunt familiarizaţi cu subiectul lucrarii. Abstract este complet în cazul în care este capabil sa descrie în mod adecvat raportul de cercetare doar prin furnizarea de informaţii suficiente pentru a face rezultatele de înţeles. În mod normal, ar trebui să fie un rezumat de maximum 250 cuvinte lung. Rezumatul este redactat în limba engleză.
Cuvinte cheie
Scopul este de a oferi o clasificare foarte rapidă pentru raportul de cercetare al autorului. Cuvinte cheie (5-6 cuvinte cheie) trebuie prezentate dupa abstract, in Times Roman 12-ingrosate; cuvintele cheie sunt separate de ; “punct si virgula. Se lasă două rânduri libere după cuvinte cheie, şi apoi începe textul principal.
Informatii biografice ale autorului
Textele trebuie să fie insotite de: informatii legate de biografia autorului (titlul profesional, grad didactic, afilierea institutionala, date de contact - adresa, telefon -, precum si adresa de e-mail), o listă de publicaţii autorului principal (1 / 2 pagină), o fotografie digitală în. Jpeg sau. jpg (opţional). Toate aceste informaţii vor fi publice pentru autorii selectati. Prezentarea unui manuscris implică faptul că autorul certifică faptul că materialul nu este protejat de copyright si nu este in prezent in curs de revizuire pentru orice jurnal sau conferinţe. Dacă raportul de cercetare (sau orice versiune sau parte a acestuia), a aparut, sau va aparea, intr-o altă publicatie de orice fel, detaliile cu privire la o astfel de publicare trebuie sa fie aduse la cunostinta editorilor, la momentul depunerii.
Citate de referinţă în cadrul textului
Utilizati numele de familie a autorului, anul publicatiei ex., (Cojocaru, 2008; Cousins and Whitmore, 1998; Cooperrider, Whitney and Stavros, 2005: 26)”. La prima referire, cu trei-cinci autori, dati toate numele in totalitate, ulterior, utilizati [primul autor] “et al.”. In referinte, primii şase autori ar trebui să fie enumerati toti. In cazul in care citati mai mult de un articol de acelaşi autor, din acelasi an , folositi literele a, b, c, etc, care sunt trecute dupa anul aparitiei.
Bibliografia
Lista completa de referinte citate in text trebuie sa fie prezentata la sfarsitul lucrarii, in ordinea alfabetica a numelor autorilor (sau in ordine cronologică pentru un grup de referinte ale aceluiasi autori). Nu poate fi trecuta la bibliografie nicio lucrare care nu are referinte in text. Bibliografia incepe ca o noua pagina, dactilografiata dublu distantate. Titluri de reviste si carti trebuie prezentate integral (fara abrevieri), de exemplu:
Carti
Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. (2005). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook. The first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change, San Francisco: Crown Custom Publishing and Berret-Koethler Publishers.
Capitol in carti
Bell, J. (2004). Managing evaluation projects. In Wholey, J., Hatry, H, Newcomer, K. (coord.), Handbook of practical program evaluation, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, pp. 571-603.
Articol in reviste
Patton, M.Q. (1988). Integrating evaluation into a program for increased utility and cost-effectiveness. New Directions for Evaluation, 39, 85-94.
Ilustratii
Fisierele cu ilustratii digitale ar trebui să fie de cel putin 300 dpi, format EPS, TIFF, or PSD
Tabele si figuri
Tabelele si figurile trebuie sa fie integrate în text. Ele trebuie sa fie insotite de un titlu scurt, descriptiv, numerotat.
Manuscrisele
Manuscrise trebuie să fie de maximum 5.000 de cuvinte (incluzand bibliografia) şi trebuie să fie redactate dublu spatiale, in limba engleză. Documentele trimise pentru publicare vor fi analizate de către redactori inainte de a fi introduse în procesul de peer review. Manuscrisele trebuie să fie trimise prin e-mail ca fisier atasat, intr/un singur document care include toate imaginile si tabelele. Formatul preferat este MS Word pentru Windows. Toate manuscrisele trebuie să fie editate pentru a se conforma la stilul de scriere APA. Toate observatiile vor fi double peer review. Autorii sunt asteptati sa participe la procesul de revizuire. Prezentarea unui manuscris implică faptul că autorul certifică faptul ca materialul nu este protejat de copyright si nu este in prezent in curs de revizuire pentru alt jurnal sau pentru conferinte. Dacă articolul (sau orice versiune sau parte a acestuia), a aparut, sau va aparea, intr-o alta publicatie de orice fel, trebuie precizate editorilor detalii cu privire la o astfel de publicare la momentul depunerii articolului. Nu există taxe pentru publicare si autorii vor primi versiunea electronica a articolului prin e-mail.
Copyright transfer
Pentru a asigura atat diseminarea cat si protectia potrivita pentru materialele publicate in revista noastra RCIS ("us" or "we") cerem autorilor sa ne transfere drepturile de autor asupra articolelor trimise catre publicare.
Va rugam sa descarcati, semnati si trimite in format scanat si prin posta documentul de mai jos
Faceti click aici pentru descarcare Copyright transfer document
Publication ethics
Publication Ethics Statement
We adhere to its Code of Conduct and to its Best Practice Guidelines of COPE. The editors of this journal enforce a rigorous peer-review process together with strict ethical policies and standards to ensure to add high quality scientific works to the field of scholarly publication. Unfortunately, cases of plagiarism, data falsification, image manipulation, inappropriate authorship credit, and the like, do arise. The editors of Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala take such publishing ethics issues very seriously and are trained to proceed in such cases with a zero tolerance policy.
Authors wishing to publish their papers in Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala must abide to the following:
- Any facts that might be perceived as a possible conflict of interest of the author(s) must be disclosed in the paper prior to submission.
- Authors should accurately present their research findings and include an objective discussion of the significance of their findings.
- Data and methods used in the research need to be presented in sufficient detail in the paper, so that other researchers can replicate the work.
- Raw data should preferably be publicly deposited by the authors before submission of their manuscript. Authors need to at least have the raw data readily available for presentation to the referees and the editors of the journal, if requested. Authors need to ensure appropriate measures are taken so that raw data is retained in full for a reasonable time after publication.
- Simultaneous submission of manuscripts to more than one journal is not tolerated.
- Republishing content that is not novel is not tolerated (for example, an English translation of a paper that is already published in another language will not be accepted).
- If errors and inaccuracies are found by the authors after publication of their paper, they need to be promptly communicated to the editors of this journal so that appropriate actions can be taken.
- Your manuscript should not contain any information that has already been published. If you include already published figures or images, please obtain the necessary permission from the copyright holder to publish under the CC-BY license.
- Plagiarism, data fabrication and image manipulation are not tolerated.
Plagiarism is not acceptable in Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala submissions.
Plagiarism includes copying text, ideas, images, or data from another source, even from your own publications, without giving any credit to the original source.
Reuse of text that is copied from another source must be between quotes and the original source must be cited. If a study's design or the manuscript's structure or language has been inspired by previous works, these works must be explicitly cited.
If plagiarism is detected during the peer review process, the manuscript may be rejected. If plagiarism is detected after publication, we may publish a correction or retract the paper.
Image files must not be manipulated or adjusted in any way that could lead to misinterpretation of the information provided by the original image.
Irregular manipulation includes: 1) introduction, enhancement, moving, or removing features from the original image; 2) grouping of images that should obviously be presented separately (e.g., from different parts of the same gel, or from different gels); or 3) modifying the contrast, brightness or color balance to obscure, eliminate or enhance some information.
If irregular image manipulation is identified and confirmed during the peer review process, we may reject the manuscript. If irregular image manipulation is identified and confirmed after publication, we may correct or retract the paper.
Our in-house editors will investigate any allegations of publication misconduct and may contact the authors' institutions or funders if necessary. If evidence of misconduct is found, appropriate action will be taken to correct or retract the publication. Authors are expected to comply with the best ethical publication practices when publishing with EXPERT PROJECTS.
Reviewer Suggestions
During the submission process, please suggest three potential reviewers with the appropriate expertise to review the manuscript. The editors will not necessarily approach these referees. Please provide detailed contact information (address, homepage, phone, e-mail address). The proposed referees should neither be current collaborators of the co-authors nor have published with any of the co-authors of the manuscript within the last five years. Proposed reviewers should be from different institutions to the authors. You may identify appropriate Editorial Board members of the journal as potential reviewers. You may suggest reviewers from among the authors that you frequently cite in your paper.
English Corrections
To facilitate proper peer-reviewing of your manuscript, it is essential that it is submitted in grammatically correct English. If you are not a native English speaker, we recommend that you have your manuscript professionally edited before submission or read by a native English-speaking colleague. This can be carried out by EXPERT PROJECTS . Professional editing will enable reviewers and future readers to more easily read and assess the content of submitted manuscripts.
Reviewers Recommendation
Authors can recommend potential reviewers. Journal editors will check to make sure there are no conflict of interests before contacting those reviewers, and will not consider those with competing interests. Reviewers are asked to declare any conflicts of interest. Authors can also enter the names of potential peer reviewers they wish to exclude from consideration in the peer review of their manuscript, during the initial submission progress. The editorial team will respect these requests so long as this does not interfere with the objective and thorough assessment of the submission.
Editors and Journal Staff as Authors
Editorial independence is extremely important and EXPERT PROJECTS does not interfere with editorial decisions. Editorial staff or editors shall not be involved in the processing their own academic work. Submissions authored by editorial staff/editors will be assigned to at least two independent outside reviewers. Decisions will be made by other editorial board members who do not have conflict of interests with the author. Journal staff are not involved in the processing of their own work submitted to any EXPERT PROJECTS journals.
Conflict of Interests
Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interest that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. If there is no conflict of interest, please state "The authors declare no conflict of interest." Any role of the funding sponsors in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section.
Editorial Procedures and Peer-Review
Initial Checks
All submitted manuscripts received by the Editorial Office will be checked by a professional in-house Managing Editor to determine whether they are properly prepared and whether they follow the ethical policies of the journal, including those for human and animal experimentation. Manuscripts that do not fit the journal's ethics policy or do not meet the standards of the journal will be rejected before peer-review. Manuscripts that are not properly prepared will be returned to the authors for revision and resubmission. After these checks, the Managing Editor will consult the journals’ Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors to determine whether the manuscript fits the scope of the journal and whether it is scientifically sound. No judgment on the potential impact of the work will be made at this stage. Reject decisions at this stage will be verified by the Editor-in-Chief.
Peer-Review
Once a manuscript passes the initial checks, it will be assigned to at least two independent experts for peer-review. A single-blind review is applied, where authors' identities are known to reviewers. Peer review comments are confidential and will only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. In the case of regular submissions, in-house assistant editors will invite experts, including recommendations by an academic editor. These experts may also include Editorial Board members and Guest Editors of the journal. Potential reviewers suggested by the authors may also be considered. Reviewers should not have published with any of the co-authors during the past five years and should not currently work or collaborate with any of the institutions of the co-authors of the submitted manuscript.
Optional Open Peer-Review
The journal operates optional open peer-review: Authors are given the option for all review reports and editorial decisions to be published alongside their manuscript. In addition, reviewers can sign their review, i.e., identify themselves in the published review reports. Authors can alter their choice for open review at any time before publication, however once the paper has been published changes will only be made at the discretion of the Publisher and Editor-in-Chief. We encourage authors to take advantage of this opportunity as proof of the rigorous process employed in publishing their research. To guarantee an impartial refereeing the names of referees will be revealed only if the referees agree to do so, and after a paper has been accepted for publication.
Editorial Decision and Revision
All the articles, reviews and communications published in EXPERT PROJECTS journals go through the peer-review process and receive at least two reviews. The in-house editor will communicate the decision of the academic editor, which will be one of the following:
- Accept after Minor Revisions: The paper is in principle accepted after revision based on the reviewer’s comments. Authors are given seven days for minor revisions.
- Reconsider after Major Revisions: The acceptance of the manuscript would depend on the revisions. The author needs to provide a point by point response or provide a rebuttal if some of the reviewer’s comments cannot be revised. Usually, only one round of major revisions is allowed. Authors will be asked to resubmit the revised paper within a suitable time frame, and the revised version will be returned to the reviewer for further comments.
- Reject and Encourage Resubmission: If additional collecting data are needed to support the conclusions, the manuscript will be rejected and the authors will be encouraged to re-submit the paper once further data collection have been conducted.
- Reject: The article has serious flaws, and/or makes no original significant contribution. No offer of resubmission to the journal is provided.
All reviewer comments should be responded to in a point-by-point fashion. Where the authors disagree with a reviewer, they must provide a clear response.
Author Appeals
Authors may appeal a rejection by sending an e-mail to the Editorial Office of the journal. The appeal must provide a detailed justification, including point-by-point responses to the reviewers' and/or Editor's comments. The Managing Editor of the journal will forward the manuscript and related information (including the identities of the referees) to the Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editor, or Editorial Board member. The academic Editor being consulted will be asked to give an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed.
In the case of a special issue, the Managing Editor of the journal will forward the manuscript and related information (including the identities of the referees) to the Editor-in-Chief who will be asked to give an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. A reject decision at this stage will be final and cannot be reversed.
Production and Publication
Once accepted, the manuscript will undergo professional copy-editing, English editing, proofreading by the authors, final corrections, pagination, and, publication.
Link for submission
The link for submissions is: https://www.rcis.ro/onlinesubmit