Dual Effects of Managerial Pro-Social Rule Breaking on Employee Behavior in the Chinese Context
Autori:
Xiaoguang LIU, Jizu LI
Cod: ISSN: 1583-3410 (print), ISSN: 1584-5397 (electronic)
Dimensiuni: pp. 187-201
How to cite this article:Liu, X., Li, J. (2015). Dual Effects of Managerial Pro-Social Rule Breaking on Employee Behavior in the Chinese Context. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 51, 187-201. |
Abstract:
Currently, the phenomenon that social rule is overshadowed by power and
favor exchange still exists in Chinese culture and society. Consequently, the
problem of managerial pro-social rule breaking (MPSRB) occurs frequently in
enterprise management. However, the consequences of MPSRB are relatively
ambiguous and controversial. Using interview data obtained from Beijing, Shanghai,
Tianjin, and Xi’an in China, the categories of MPSRB and their influence on
employee behavior were explored in this study by integrating universalism and
particularism from the perspectives of trust in leadership and institutional trust.
Results show that in the Chinese context, MPSRB can be classified as benevolence-
based, practicability-based and justice-based, and its influence on employees’
organizational trust (i.e., trust in leadership and institutional trust) is
dualistic and opposite, that is, MPSRB improves employees’ trust in leadership
while decreasing institutional trust. Through the mediating effect of trust in
leadership, MPSRB improves relation-oriented employee behavior. By contrast,
MPSRB reduces task-oriented employee behavior through the mediating effect of
institutional trust. These findings can actively contribute toward the enhancement
of Chinese organizational behavior and social behavior intervention theories.
Furthermore, the results are beneficial for enterprises with respect to the positive
interventions and guidance of managers and employees’ behaviors by developing
scientific and rational management measures necessary for further improvement
in organizational effectiveness.
Keywords:
managerial pro-social rule breaking, trust in leadership, institutional trust, behavior intervention, Chinese context.
< Prev | Next > |
---|